Shortly after the Center released the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill 2021, which proposes to penalize film piracy and empower the central government to order the recertification of an already certified film following receipt. of complaints, he received much criticism from many actors and filmmakers.
Let’s understand why the filmmakers oppose the amendments included in the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill 2021:
What are the significant changes proposed?
> The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting wishes to add a provision to the law giving powers of review to the Center. If Article 5B (1): Guiding Principles for Film Certification is violated, then the Center can use its power to overturn the decision of the Central Film Certification Board.
Read | Twitter’s woes in India amid various controversies
> The project comes shortly after the abolition of the Film Certificate Appeal Tribunal. It was the last place filmmakers could appeal if they weren’t happy with their film’s certificate. âSince the provisions of Article 5B (1) are derived from Article 19 (2) of the Constitution and are non-negotiable, it is also proposed in the draft law to add a reservation to subsection (1) of Article 6 to the effect that upon receipt of any reference by the central government concerning a film certified for public viewing, due to a violation of Article 5B (1 ) of the law, the central government can, if it deems it necessary, ask the chairman of the board of directors to review the film, âhe said.
> The project also proposes to award certificates to films in perpetuity, which is currently set at 10 years.
> The ministry said the provisions for certification of films in the “Unlimited public exhibition” category should be amended to further subdivide the existing UA category into categories based on age.
> The ministry also wants to add a provision to penalize film piracy. The draft bill proposes to insert Article 6AA which prohibits unauthorized recording. According to Article 6AA, âNotwithstanding any law currently in force, no one may, without the written permission of the author, be authorized to use an audiovisual recording device in a place to make or knowingly transmit or attempt to do so. or to transmit or encourage the making or transmission of a copy of a film or part thereof. “
How does he plan to categorize the films?
According to the proposed law, films will be classified as follows:
> Category ‘U’: This is for unrestricted public display.
> Category “U / A”: this requires parental supervision for children under 12 years old. âU / Aâ is further divided into three categories according to the age of the children: U / A 7+, U / A 13+ and U / Un 16+.
> Category ‘A’: This is for adult films.
Read | ‘Cold Case’ movie review: Prithviraj-starrer is a major disappointment
What is the proposed sanction for pirating films?
Although there is no piracy policy in the Cinematograph Act, 1952, in the amendments the government proposes to include section 6AA to prohibit unauthorized recording.
If the law is violated, the penalty will be “a term of imprisonment of at least three months”. This sentence can be extended up to three years and accompanied by a fine “which must not be less than Rs 3 lakh but which can go up to 5% of the audited gross production cost or with both”.
Why are filmmakers opposed to the proposed changes?
Filmmakers believe the proposed amendments will make them powerless against the state and more vulnerable to threats, vandalism and intimidation from Mafia censors.
Actor-turned-politician Kamal Haasan took to Twitter to criticize the Film (Amendment) Bill 2021 on Tuesday.
Read | Karthik: OTT allows you to explore sensitive topics
In his tweet, he wrote: âThe cinema, the media and the literate cannot afford to be the iconic three monkeys of India. Seeing, hearing and talking about impending evil is the only remedy against attempts to undermine and weaken democracy. He urged his fans to speak out against the amendments.
The cinema, the media and the literate cannot afford to be the three iconic monkeys of India. Seeing, hearing and talking about impending evil is the only remedy against attempts to undermine and weaken democracy. (1/2)
– Kamal Haasan (@ikamalhaasan) June 28, 2021
Calling it “another blow to film fraternity,” more than 1,400 filmmakers signed an open letter to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. Anurag Kashyap, Hansal Mehta, Vetri Maaran, Nandita Das, Shabana Azmi, Farhan Akhtar, Zoya Akhtar and Dibakar Banerjee also protested against the proposed amendments.
In another blow to the film fraternity, the I&B Ministry proposed new amendments to the Film Law under which the central government would have the power to revoke or revoke the certification of films that have already been licensed. by the Censor Board.
– Prashant Umrao (@ippatel) June 28, 2021
This proposed amendment / draft law on the cinematograph law will make the making of films impossible. All film organizations should make strong representation to government. @anubhavsinha @nairsameer @PritishNandy @nikkhiladvani @ mayankw14
– Sudhir Mishra (@IAmSudhirMishra) June 26, 2021